Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Question for Corporate Social Responsibility Essay
III. Corporate Social Responsibility Fact Pattern Question for your essay
Apple Inc.’s success with products like the iPhone and iPad led the company to rely on Asian manufacturers to produce its products at a lower cost. These companies were not/are not Apple employees. Apple bears no legal responsibility for the work of these companies. Ap-ple was accused by activists of knowingly endorsing the use of conflict minerals in its products because these manufacturers were not focused on checking the origins of the minerals they used. https://essayharbour.info/2021/05/25/a% e2 percent 80 percent 8c% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d% e2 percent 80 percent 8d
Conflict minerals have resulted in human rights violations in volatile parts of the world. Conflict minerals such as tin, tungsten, and tantalum extracted from illegal mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Congo) and neighboring countries were used to fund armed militias fighting against the government and violating the human rights of people living in conflict areas.
Since 2010, when it began to face pressure from activist groups, Apple has implemented a number of programs to address the issue of conflict minerals. Despite all of Apple’s efforts, the company faces an uphill battle. The CEO must make a critical decision about whether or not to expand his operations in Asia. https://essaypandit.com/case-study-mr-m-it-is-necessary-for-an-rn-bsn-prepared-nurse-to-demonstrate/ Should Apple continue to use the same Asian manufacturers as before? Role-playing: Assume you’re the CEO of Apple, and you’re tasked with deciding which of the following three options to pursue:
Please only answer 1a and 1b for both questions while answering the questions below. That is, you will answer the following questions for both 1(a) and 1(b). 1) Will you continue to use the same Asian manufacturers? 2) Will you work with other companies?
3) Are you planning to leave the area? (a) Question 1: Make your decision based on the stakeholder model of Corporate Social Responsibility. Explain how the key points in your analysis influenced your decision to keep using the same manufacturers, switch to other manufacturers in the region, or leave the region entirely.
Question 1(b): Make your decision using the economic model in a separate answer. Explain how the key points in your analysis helped you decide whether to stick with the same manufacturers, switch to other manufacturers in the region, or leave the region entirely. Assume the following: Apple has violated no international or national laws. https://theeliteessaywriters.com/2021/05/26/readchapters-4-and-29-in-yoder-wise-p-s-2018-leading-and-managing-in-nurs/
Even if the manufacturing companies to which Apple outsources its work break local or international laws directly or indirectly, Apple is not legally liable for their actions. Apple’s profits will be reduced by 75% if it chooses to use other manufacturers in the region. The company would still make a profit, but it would be significantly lower than under the previous arrangement.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Question for Corporate Social Responsibility Essay |
Question for Corporate Social Responsibility Essay