Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Ethics, cooperation, leadership, and legal decisions of the agency are all evaluated.
OVERVIEW OF THE ASSIGNMENT
As a consultant, you’ll need to conduct a thorough analysis and evaluation of the chosen agency’s ethics, cooperation, leadership, and legal judgments, as well as make ideas for change. As a result, you’ll interview agency personnel and do research into related academic sources and government websites. The VP of accounts and client assistance, as well as the leaders of the agency for whom you are working, will read the analysis.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT
Write a 56 page paper that includes the following:
Analyze 23 recent events over the last two years, emphasizing administrative accountability and ethical consequences for stakeholders, organizations, and the general public about the issues raised in the current occurrences. This section should be called Administrative Ethics. To get current events news, go to The Center for Public Integrity, choose a topic, and read the most recent news articles about it.
Examine this agency’s leadership in light of leadership models and the political context in which it operates, identifying at least three ways in which internal agency leaders and political leaders have influenced the agency’s success or failure. This section should be called Leadership Influences.
Examine the agency’s authority in enforcing the regulations it is tasked with regulating. You can learn more about these by visiting the United States Government Publishing Office, typing your desired agency’s name into the search engine, and looking at the agency’s most recent judgments. Discuss two to three obstacles to enforcing the agency’s rules. This section should be called Legal Decisions.
Analyze 34 administrative ethics, leadership, and legal strategies for the agency’s future goals to improve the agency’s operation and services to its core recipients. This section should be called Administrative Processes Strategies.
Recommend two solutions based on models that impact public policy and the 34 techniques described in the previous criterion that will provide immediate benefit, along with an explanation for each recommendation. This section should be called Recommendations for Administrative Process Improvements.
For 12 interviews, complete the PAD599 Interview Template and include it in the Appendix under Interviews.
To discover and give 45 relevant and reliable outside resources that support the topic of this assignment, go to Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library. Only one non-government website should be included.
Note: In Week 1’s Assignment Preparation, you’ll find the Guidelines for Interview Assignments at Strayer University.
These formatting guidelines must be followed in your assignment:
Typed, double-spaced, in Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; APA-style citations and references are required. Any additional instructions should be sought from your lecturer.
Include a cover page with the assignment title, your name, the name of the professor, the course title, and the date. The sections must-have titles that are relevant. The required assignment page length does not include the cover page, reference page, or appendices pages. The
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|