racially progressive change
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Question Description
Based on the textbook Getting Real About Race by Stephanie McClure and Cherise Harris (2015)1. Imagine you encounter a hypothetical Jack and Jill. Choose 2 of the 4 frames of colorblind racism (abstract liberalism, naturalization, minimization. or cultural racism)- and assign one frame to Jack and one to Jill. Write a hypothetical conversation where Jack and Jill are making racist statements in these 2 frames, and you are the “hero” character that will enter the scene and practice bystander antiracism. What will you say to each of them? Take great care to use your own words, while at the same time incorporate new knowledge you did not have before this Sociology class.
2. You have just met two white people, Wanda and Wilma. According to this week’s reading definitions, one is a “friend” and one is the “ally.” How will you tell the difference? Describe specific behaviors that each engages in to reveal which one is which.
3. Imagine you have moved to a town where there are some major racial disparities, especially with respect to racial segregation of neighborhoods and environmental quality in the different neighborhoods (better water and air in white neighborhoods; toxic air/water in others). Top governmental officials made decisions to save money but are “not racist” and did not claim to know racial background of neighborhoods when planning. What are 3 concrete actions you would take as a private citizen, but also in working with others, to create racially progressive change?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow racially progressive change
racially progressive change