Real-Life Negotiations Combine Role Play Paper Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Real-Life Negotiations Combine Role Play Paper Assignment
2 papers combined in 1 file each paper 2.5 pages
instructionTwo Role Play/Integration papers that will total 5 pgs. in length and serve as the basis for individual reflection on your role, behavior, and results during the role plays and negotiation simulations during the residential class. You can pick any two to report on. The papers should include the following:
Briefly, what happened, and what were the critical moves that moved?
What did you learn about yourself? The behavior of others?
What role did communication (verbal and nonverbal), power, cultural issues, emotions, assumptions, perceptions play in the negotiation?
What ethical issues did you have to consider? Would you conduct yourself the same way in the future? If not, what would you do differently and why?
How do the concepts and strategies from lectures and readings enrich your understanding of how and why the role-play/simulation proceeded as it did?
How did this negotiation experience parallel your real-life negotiations?
How are you working on your “reputation” as a negotiator? What would your counterpart say about your reputation? Do you care?
I send you this example paper just to have an idea about how to Combine Role Play/Paper.
Remember the paper you have to write is not bigger than this example.
I have attached the two reports and a sample paper of the format also, I need a separate outline
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow