Risk Management Plan Case Study Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Risk Management Plan Case Study Assignment
Module 06 Content
For the final submission of your course project you will complete both your Risk Register and submit the Risk Monitoring Plan that you have been developing throughout the course.
Note: Make sure to refer to the Risk Management Plan template if needed.
CIS3139fw_Risk_Monitoring_Plan_06172019
Risk Register
For the final additions to your Risk Register, you will fill out the Risk Control section (Column 3a-3c) for the top 10 risks identified in Module 03. Be sure to identify the control measures that can be used to mitigate each operational risk. A reassessment of the RPN (Risk Prioritization Number) must also be addressed.Risk Monitoring Plan
For your final submission, you will use all your previous work on the Risk Register and your summary reports to complete the Risk Monitoring Plan. For your final Risk Monitoring Plan be sure to:Classify business risks as they relate to information gathered in Module 01 – 05.
Identify three Security Controls.
Evaluate security control effectiveness for each risk mitigation.
Identify who, if anybody, should be in charge of an organization’s conduct.
Identify regulating ethical standards and who should watch over the regulators and define information system risks.
Identify the key components needed to create a risk management continuous monitoring plan.
Finally, your plan will provide your proposals for providing Continuous Assessment, Continuous Reporting, and Continuous Authorization.
Submit your completed assignments by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow