Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy
Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy
George Bailey (played by James Stewart in the movie It’s a Wonderful Life) was the chief executive officer of an inherited loan company (Bailey Saving and Loan) that operated during the Great Depression. The financial company provided loans to people to build and buy homes. George grew up helping others. He was well liked and respected in the community. It could be said that he proved to be a leader in the community. However, throughout the movie, George questioned his abilities, especially when he watched his brother becoming a war hero after going to college and his best friend becoming a rich plastics manufacturer. James Stewart captured the emotions of a man going through life with intensity and a sense of low self-esteem—a man who, at times, did not believe he could make ends meet and run the company.
Self-esteem is “a person’s overall self-evaluation or sense of self-worth” (Myers, 2008). According to Wojciszke and Struzynska-Kujalowicz (2007), power and self-esteem go together. Strong and effective leadership is positively correlated with not only high self-esteem but also an internal locus of control. In the case of George Bailey, there were other factors that seemed to interfere with his self-esteem and self-efficacy. Let’s discuss the factors that shaped George’s behavior.
Myers, D. (2008). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Wojciszke, B., & Struzynska-Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self-esteem. Social Cognition, 25(4), 472–494.
Perceived Self-Control.html
Perceived Self-Control
If you analyze George Bailey’s life, you might observe that much of his life was not in his control. Each time he planned something for himself, such as going to college, travelling, or becoming an engineer, his plans were obstructed by events that were out of his control. For instance, when his father passed away, George was forced to take over the management of the company to save it from being sold to Mr. Potter. Similarly, toward the end of the movie, George’s uncle Bill Bailey, an absentminded cofounder of the company, lost the deposit money of $8,000 at the time the company was under audit. This crisis situation forced George to approach the villain of the movie, Mr. Potter, for help, but Mr. Potter rebuked George, sending him into a self-destructive tailspin.
The question that arises then is, did the events that happened to George throughout his life constitute an internal or external locus of control? The answer to this question probably is that George’s life having many challenges and unexpected turns did not necessarily mean he had an external locus of control. Myers (2008) defined a locus of control as “the extent to which people perceive outcomes as internally controlled by their own efforts and actions or externally controlled by chance or outside forces.”
At the end of the movie, George’s guardian angel made George understand what would have happened had George not existed. George realized his life had a significant impact on the lives of others. His acceptance of being unable to control the unfolding events because of several external factors leads us to the conclusion that he had an external locus of control.
Myers, D. (2008). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
reason for choice:since Self-efficacy has become an important variable within social psychological research on its association with various favorable consequences related to mental health.
Developing a r esearch p roposal is a good way to experience the r esearch aspects of social psychology firsthand without conducting an actual r esearch study.
In this a ssignment, you need to develop a r esearch p roposal.
Introduction
Literature Review
Methodology
Discussion and Conclusion
References
Each week, you will concentrate on creating a section of the r esearch p roposal. The Methodology section may be based on either of the two major r esearch designs, quantitative and qualitative. You will develop the f inal p roject as the course progresses by collating all the sections and incorporating them into a f inal p roposal due for submission in Week 10.
********This Week*****************
Work on the Introduction section of the r esearch p roposal. Include the following:
Select a topic for your r esearch p roject.
Explain why this topic is of interest to you (Be careful not to use first-person as this is a formal p aper).
Explain the topic and describe the potential research areas in the topic.
Using APA format, be sure to parenthetically cite your sources, and Reference on a separate page.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy |
Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy