SLU Political Science Exploitative Social Classifications Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
SLU Political Science Exploitative Social Classifications Essay
Assignment : Citation and Analysis Exercise. Choose a passage from Marx and Engels text(chapter 1 and 2), and write two double-spaced pages using this passage to present an interpretation of the text. Include a comparison of your interpretation with Hall’s(Rethinking the Base and Superstructure).
Instructions for Homework:
Find a passage in this week’s readings that seems important. Make sure it is complex and interesting enough to use for this assignment. In 2 pages typed and double-spaced), include the following in order:
Please use MLA format as professor preference
No outside research is required for this assignment
Only focus on chapter 1 and 2 , which topics are Bourgeois and Proletarians, Proletarians and Communists
so ,the assignment structure like that Context ,Cite ,Paraphrase and analysis , then compare it with halls In 2 double space pages
I have also attached the halls’ article that Rethinking base and superstructure, as the paragraph format you have topic sentence, insert quote and explain what it means and analyze it and connect it to halls
SLU Political Science Exploitative Social Classifications Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow