Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Social Science Counseling Reflective Journal Essay
Reflective Journal
2500 Words
Students are required to maintain a reflective journal from week two to week eleven. The journal needs to highlight the interaction with the module materials and highlight the progress made through the module. The journal also needs to cover concerns raised and how students have responded to them
Assessment Description: Reflective Journal: Write and maintain a reflective journal from week two to week eleven. The journal needs to highlight your interaction with the module materials and highlight the progress made through the module. The journal also needs to cover concerns raised and how you have responded to them, using examples where possible.
You are encouraged to summarize and condense each weekly entry down to 200 words for submission. In your journal, please reflect on the learning outcomes below:
In each entry you need to address the following:
Description – What happened?
Analysis – Why did it happen? What were you feeling? What theories might help explain what happened? Are there other perspectives that challenge your views?
Outcomes or Actions – What did you learn? What would you do differently next time? When reflecting on your learning (such as an educational theory you have learned about within a unit) you might address the following questions:
Description – What is the concept, idea or theory you are reflecting on?
Analysis – Are there aspects you found particularly interesting or challenging? Does it tie in with anything you have learned in the past? Has it changed the way you think, or affirmed something you already knew?
Outcomes or Action – What else might you need to find out? Do you have any questions? How might you incorporate or apply these ideas in the future, perhaps in your professional life? Whether reflecting on an experience, on your own learning, or both, you will need to make sure you include description, analysis and outcomes or action.
Your final version of journal should include: · an introductory section (approximately 250 words) setting the context for your journal and what you hope to achieve · an entry for each week from week 2 to week 11 (app. 200 words each) · a summary section (approximately 250 words) outlining what you have learned from your journal and how you will apply that knowledge
This journal is assessing for your capacity to reflect on, and integrate, the theory into your counselling practice. It is written in the first person and the literature can be used to support comments
220
Social Science Counseling Reflective Journal Essay
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Social Science Counseling Reflective Journal Essay |
Social Science Counseling Reflective Journal Essay