Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Question Description
A good discussion posts consists of the following:
Organization – Five sentence paragraphs with an introduction, three supporting sentences, and a conclusion sentence. Think about this same organization for your discussion posts: several paragraphs in your post, one paragraph as an introduction, supporting paragraphs, and then a conclusion paragraph. (Please note: This format is only a suggestion, you may need more or less paragraphs to appropriatly address the discussion topic).
Dont rely too heavily on quotes – Take several articles and point them together into a unique way. We want your thinking supported by research. An example of this is to remember to paraphrase the work that you are researching and make it your words but still cite the source. We want to see more of your words and less quotes.
PROMPT:
Using the vignette (link below) and an ethical decision making model in the Cournoyer textbook, identify at least one ethical dilemma that could present itself in this situation.
Address how you would handle the issue using the Code of Ethics and one of the ethical decision making models presented in the Cournoyer textbook.
Use these sources to answer the discussion questions
Vignette-Nina
Decision Making Model.ppt
Your Tasks:
Make an initial, substantive post of at least 250 – 350 words considering the directions and prompt above.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Social Work Discussion, sociology homework |
Social Work Discussion, sociology homework