Statistics Application Evaluation Criteria
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Statistics Application Evaluation Criteria
Use this rubric for the following Applications: Factorial ANOVA (Week 3), ANOVA with Repeated Measures (Week 4), ANCOVA (Week 5), Multiple Regression (Week 6), Linear Multiple Regression (Week 7), Odds Ratio (Week 8), Logistic Regression (Week 9), Cronbach’s Alpha (Week 11).
During several weeks of the term, you will be required to run statistics problems using SPSS. The website of the primary textbook author provides answers to most questions to help guide you as you work. However, you will be required to document your work and submit it as a package to your instructor. Please use this document as guidance for submitting your PASW weekly applications. Note that each assignment is worth 50 points; point assignments are indicated next to each indicator.
Create a master MS Word document (you should only be submitting ONE document each week). Label it in accordance with the convention described in your syllabus. Inside of this document, include the following information.
- (5 pts) State the underlying assumptions for the statistical test.
- (5 pts) State whether the assumptions have been met. If the assumptions were not met (either in actuality or hypothetically), state what alternatives you have available to you.
- (5 pts) State the null and alternative (research) hypotheses.
- (5 pts) Copy your syntax file and paste it into your MS Word Document.
- (5 pts) For your output file: Select all ( Copy all objects ( Paste into your MS word document. This will ensure that your output is in a form that your instructor can read.
- (10 pts) Create a results table consistent with requirements from the APA style manual.
- (10 pts) Report the results using correct APA format.
- For ANOVA, ANCOVA, and Repeated Measures ANOVA models, ensure that you provide interpretations for the main effects and interactions as well as any post-hoc tests.
- For Multiple and Logistic Regression models, ensure that you include appropriate measures of model fit as well as the specific procedure used (e.g., Hierarchical, Enter, Stepwise, Forward, Backward).
- (5 pts) Describe how you would compute the sample size to achieve 80% power, alpha = .05, and the appropriate effect size.
Statistics Application Evaluation Criteria
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow