Strategic Management and Leadership Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Strategic Management and Leadership Assignment
Please use Hua Wei as the company.
Attached assignment brief and below is the expansion.
Attached a sample assignment (follow very closely, especially how the Value Chain/ VRIN was done) on Air Asia.
1. A brief (maximum 100 words) introduction to the company
WORD COUNT WILL NOT BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.
-Nature of business
-Market segments served
2. Company data which can be used to evaluate its success concluding with your thoughts about whether or not the company can be described as successful.
300 WORDS. talk about the “HOW?” Present with data, e.g. financial performance or employee satisfaction rating.
-An academic definition of success
-How to measure the success of the company (use Balanced Scorecard)
3. An outline of 6 to10 business reasons behind the success stated in a simple, straightforward way with a brief (4/5 sentences) explanation of each reason. Avoid strategy jargon; no analysis is required this is a test of your broad business knowledge and understanding.
300 WORDS. talk about the “WHY?”
-What are the critical success factors?
Please give at least 8-9 reasons, 2 to 3 sentences for each reason.
4. A detailed analysis of the companys strategic capabilities starting with a Value Chain and followed by a VRIN evaluation. Your interpretation of the analysis must clearly show how the company has been able to build competitive advantage.
800-1000 WORDS. Most important part of this assignment.
*REFER TO SAMPLE ATTACHED*
-Value chain*
-Core competencies
-Analyse internal capabilities using VRIN framework
5. An evaluation of the contribution of leadership to the companys success, basing this on appropriate theory. A wide range of topics will be acceptable including: o Leadership (e.g. styles, attributes) o Management theories o Organisational culture o Decision-making
MAX 800 WORDS. Use The Blake Managerial Grid.
Talk about the leader, not company. E.g. Apple = Steve Jobs. So, Hua Wei = Ren Zhengfei
6. A detailed analysis and interpretation based on one further topic area from the following list: o Business (competitive) strategy consistent with strategic capabilities o International strategy (based on the framework in Exploring Strategy) o Innovation strategy o Collaboration (alliances, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions)
-Growth strategy
-International strategy
-Competitive Strategy
-Collaborative strategy
Critic and not describe how good they are. Do not describe what the company have done or is doing.
7. An explanation of any external and/or internal factors that might make it difficult for the company to be successful in the future and suggestions (based upon your prior analysis) as to how the company can best deal with these.
500 WORDS. PEST ANALYSIS?
Analyse the sustainability of the company based on environmental trends.
*your prediction of the company’s success in 10 years. no recommendation needed.
DO NOT USE SWOT ANALYSIS IN ASSIGNMENT.
DO NOT USE ANSOFF MODEL IN ASSIGNMENT.
Discuss if Huawei used backward/forward/horizontal/vertical integration? What values did they create for customers? (Related Diversification)
Strategic Management and Leadership Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Strategic Management and Leadership Assignment