strong ethical leadership attributes assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
strong ethical leadership attributes assignment
5.1 Assignment-Devotional- The Way, The Truth, The Life Part 5
Getting Started
An old pop song from the early 1980s asked, What’s Love Got to Do With It? The song seemed to imply that relationships could proceed without love and that it was actually safer to engage in some (romantic) relationships by distancing oneself rather than fully committing, although, like many songs, its meaning was open to interpretation.
This devotional assignment gives you the chance to grapple with a similar question, which may call that sort of pessimistic perspective into doubt. Perhaps, even suggesting that for ethical conduct, love has everything to do with it.
Upon successful completion of this assignment, you will be able to:
- Recognize strong ethical leadership attributes by studying leaders in the Bible.
Background Information
This week read John 15:9-17(new tab) (or listen to the chapter(new tab) ) Jesus references several words that we’ve already seen in the passage such as obey, love, commands, and remain. He also adds a well-known description that “Greater love has no one….”
After reading the passage, consider the following prompts:
- Greater love as laying down one’s life for another seems reflective of being willing to sacrifice for the good of another. How do these themes apply in our personal and professional practice when it comes to ethics and decision-making around people, plans, and resources (or do they?).
- Is there any specific thing you’ve studied in the course so far that seems to involve sacrifice for another? For integrity and honesty? For love? What might love and sacrifice look like in various forms in the context of leadership?
Instructions
- Review the Bible text and prompts provided in the Background Information section.
- Compose a 200 – 250 word reflection or journal (Word document) on the prompts included in the background information section.
Note: Your reflection does not need to answer each of the provided prompts. Rather, use those prompts to help stimulate your reflection. Your 200 – 250 word “journal” should simply be your personal and professional thinking that emerges from the reading and reflection.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow