Summary and Video Response Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Summary and Video Response Assignment
Subject: Art & architecture
Topic: Summary and Video response
Paper details:
1) Write a 2 page summary of Edward Branigan’s Fiction 2) Watch this clip (HERE) from Jean Renoir’s Rules of the Game and respond to the questions below. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJuIhxeBnT4 Questions to ask yourself while viewing the clip of the hunting scene: 1) Does the fact that these deaths occurred 81
years ago in any way desensitize your response? 2) Does knowing that these animals actually died in the service of this film shift the way that you respond to the scene? 3) While reading Sobchak’s essay, one has the impression that only a single rabbit died– when in fact it is clear that many rabbits and birds died in this hunting
scene. Is there a singular moment to which she appears to be referring? If so, identify it and the precise moment in the clip (cite the time- i.e.: Renoir, 01:15 – 02:00). 4) Do you agree with the premise of Sobchak’s argument after watching the scene to which she refers? Why, or why not?
Summary and Video Response Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Summary and Video Response Assignment