Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Topic: Global Supply Chain Risk Management emphasis on IT infrastructure/Cybersecurity
Prompt
Final Papers should be organized according to the following outline headers (that is, Issue, Current Law & Policy, Future Law & Policy, Analysis, and Conclusion”) and have a similar thought progression:
The Issue
Here are the security benefits and challenges/problems with [your topic]:
1. Data and/or physical systems: confidentiality, integrity, access, exclusive command & control, confidence.
2. Threats: criminals (extortion, identity theft, etc), nation states (espionage and sabotage), terrorists (seeking destruction).
3. Here’s the way they can come at you: remote, insider, close access/side channel attacks, supply chain.
4. Here are some actual examples that already have been reported relating specifically to [your topic].
5. Here are some theoretical/proof of concept problems that researchers have identified relating specifically to [your topic].
Current Law and Policy
Here are the federal laws and policies that already apply to meet some of these challenges
1. These laws and policies cover the following concerns well
2. They don’t at all cover these problems
3. Internationally (and at the state/local level?), we’re seeing the following considerations in law and policy
4. The private sector has been involved by doing the following
Future Law and Policy
· Here are some of the proposed federal laws and federal policies that could help make cloud computing more secure in the future.
Analysis
· If the current policies and [these particular developing efforts or MY NEW IDEAS were put in place] that [x amount of the problem] would be resolved, and the risk would be acceptable for [these types of uses, if any] but remain unacceptable for [these types of uses, if any].
Conclusion and Way Ahead
This section pulls it all together, taking the big ideas out of each of the previous sections.
· Ultimately, the advantages of [your topic] are [xxx] but the problem is [real and growing? Overstated?]. While federal law and policy are/will be able to help with respect to [xxxx], the risks of [your topic]] will for [some time] remain too high for [unacceptable uses, if any] unless there are changes in [technology? market incentives? regulation?] that [reduce these types of vulnerabilities by doing [x], focus on deterring threat actors by establishing [y], and managing consequences better by [doing z]. Hopefully/Fortunately, we will accomplish these goals soon, because the risks to [our economic and national security, as well as the public health, otherwise are perilously in the balanc
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |