Systematic Policies Practices and Stereotypes Discussion
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Systematic Policies Practices and Stereotypes Discussion
Question Description
Essay #3 Directions
LENGTH: 1250-1500 words
For Essay #3, you will be writing a Causal Argument (refer to Chapter 11 in Everything’s an Argument) inspired by anytopics presented in Acting Out Culture, from Chapter 3 or 4 (food/diet/nutrition or education/learning/ethics) and write a
causal argument utilizing well integrated quotes from TWO sources from the text and ONE outside source found in the
JJC library database or using a search engine for support for a total of 3 sources.
All assignments must be saved as Word documents. This is a requirement of the course. If you do not save your file
correctly, it will not be accepted and if re-submitted will be considered late.
The use of first person (I, me, my, us, we, our, etc.) or second person (you, your, etc.) in this assignment is unacceptable.
If you use first person, you will be required to revise and re-submit the assignment. Additionally, you must master MLA
format for this course including but not limited to the header, heading, title, Times New Roman 12 pt font, spacing, works
cited, etc. If you use first person or do not use MLA format, you will be required to revise and resubmit the assignment,
and your assignment will be counted as late.
You must use quotes from the text as support in the body paragraphs (you should have no less than 10% and no more
than 15% quotes for support. Integrate your quotes into your sentences–this is a college level expectation. Your sources
MUST have an author and you need all three separate sources listed in alphabetical order on your works cited page
using MLA guidelines and formatting including a properly inserted hanging indent.
Systematic Policies Practices and Stereotypes Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Systematic Policies Practices and Stereotypes Discussion
Systematic Policies Practices and Stereotypes Discussion