Tax Code Assignment Discussion Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Tax Code Assignment Discussion Paper
Tax Code
Should these companies and industry sectors, such as the agricultural sector, find possible
ways to reinvent themselves in order to be able to better compete in the markets?
Numerous associations are viable planning supportability guidelines into their associations, and
they are doing in that capacity by looking for after targets that go long routes past earlier
sensitivity toward reputation organization. For example, saving imperativeness, making green
things and holding and moving laborers, all of which help associations get regard through
advancement and benefit for capital. In our sixth review of directors on how their organizations
understand and regulate issues related to reasonability, the present year's results show that, since
a year back, greater shares of authorities say supportability programs do a active duty to their
associations' little and whole deal regard.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Tax Code Assignment Discussion Paper
Tax Code Assignment Discussion Paper