Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
While reading, consider the following:
*Make a list of all the words you’re not sure about. Look them up and make a list of the definitions.
*Make a list of all the important subtopics in the reading and create a discussion question for each one.
*Take note of the areas that perplex you and those that pique your interest.
*If applicable, make a note of the connections between the readings and the films.
*Make a summary of the author’s point of view.
*Review the material and write down your thoughts on the author’s message and delivery.
After you’ve seen a movie, take a few moments to consider the following:
*Is there anything in the movie that you recognize? What’s new, difficult, or perplexing?
*How is the movie organized or structured?
*Can you describe any visual tropes?
*How do you interpret the film, and what evidence do you have to back up your interpretation?
You can watch the movie on YouTube.
I’ve attached the first reading (Epstein, Jean, “Photogénie and the Imponderable”), which is missing a few pages but that’s fine because there are only two pages missing.
Preview of the attachment
The Cinema of the Avant-Garde
Following the evolution of cinema: simply reproducing reality/technological marvel => theater/story=> abstraction/emotion
“Moreover, expresive pacing intervened in the organication of the images and gave birth to rhythm, despite the visual sense that was dawning, the story ‘for the story’ won out” => What does it mean?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
The Imponderable Debate and Photogenie |
The Imponderable Debate and Photogenie