Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The Marinovich Project Reflection Assignment
Question Description
Need help with my Communications question – I’m studying for my class.
Take some time (approximately one hour and 20 minutes) to watch the ESPN short film “The Marinovich Project.” It is the story of how Todd Marinovich was groomed from birth by his father to become the perfect football quarterback. You may need a credit card to pay the approximate $2 to watch the film.
ESPN Films – The Marinovich Project (Links to an external site.)
Write at least a one-page (double-space is fine) critical reflection of the film from your perspective. Among your comments, address the following: What do you think of this talent development “experiment?” Marinovich make the comment in the film that when people tell him he wasted his talent, he replies “How do you think I got this talent?” This suggests that he believes that his talent was developed ( much like you’re reading in the Peak book) as opposed to being innate (inborn). Wasn’t this a prime example of deliberate practice that we’re reading about? How and why did it go wrong?
Positive and Courteous Expression Questions
The Marinovich Project Reflection Assignment
Revise the following sentences to make them more positive. Give TWO examples for each, when possible.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
The Marinovich Project Reflection Assignment