The New Science of Human Capital Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The New Science of Human Capital Essay
View the videos and share how the various aspects in the video apply to you current or previous work experience. YOU MUST STATE THE TERMS, MODELS, OR CONCEPTS FROM THE COURSE TEXTOOK THAT APPLY TO WHAT YOU SAW IN THE VIDEO
AND EXPLAIN HOW AND WHY THEY APPLY. What terms or ideas that you saw in each video were most important to you? Explain why you think they are important to organizations or managers? You must reference these terms with intext citations in
proper APA format. If you mention a term or concept that is not your own, then you must put a reference at the end of the sentence from either the video or the textbook in APA format. This discussion assignment should be much more then book report of
you re-stating what happened in the video. The goal is for you to analyze what took place in the context of the terms in the book. Your post must be at least 300 words long. YOU MUST ALSO POST TO THE POSTS OF 3 DIFFERENT CLASSMATES TO GET FULL CREDIT.
Putting the human back into human resources
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Mq2TiJmqCI
Put Your Employees First
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCdu67s_C5E
The New Science of Human Capital
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3rZSIqZ0pM
To get full credit you must fully address the following:
USE THE INFORMATION BELOW AS A CHECKLIST TO ENSURE THAT YOU WILL GET FULL CREDIT.
- Post was minimum of 300 words and you must post to at least twice to another classmate post or post to two different classmates which a post that asked a question or makes a comment that is more than 30 words long.
- Analyzed and synthesizes theory and/or practice to develop new ideas and ways of conceptualizing and applying course content.
- Addressed relevance to current trends/events/climate in the industry.
- Built on the discussion by adding own examples, course materials, asking questions, etc.
- Responded to the question with intext citations in APA format. (This means paragraphs must have references embedded in them.
View the link below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbyJdMz-Ato
Link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FrJeRrLYe0
Link
https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2011/10/how-to-create-a-reference-for-a-youtube-video.html
- Used multiple terms and concepts from the course text, readings, and media to support answers. These terms must be cited in proper APA format.
- Analyzed and synthesizes theory and/or practice to develop new ideas and ways of conceptualizing and applying course content.
- Addressed relevance to current trends/events/climate.
- Built on the discussion by adding own examples, course materials, asking questions, etc.
- Demonstrated graduate level writing with correct grammar, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, and APA format.
- Wrote in full paragraphs with a sentence structure and paragraph structure of responses are clear, logical, and easy to follow. The M.E.A.L writing approach is often the most effective. Link on the writing approach: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GL_AmnVKD0g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3Y6AQ8UG_U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF_PoOz2Tl4
Use the above items as a checklist that your assignment is complete before your final submission.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The New Science of Human Capital Essay