The psychology of resilience and coping mechanisms
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The psychology of resilience and coping mechanisms
Resilience refers to an individual’s ability to adapt and bounce back from adversity, trauma, or stress. Coping mechanisms are the strategies that people use to deal with difficult situations. The psychology of resilience and coping mechanisms involves understanding how people are able to overcome challenges and what factors contribute to their ability to do so.
Research has shown that resilience is not an innate trait, but rather a set of learned behaviors and attitudes that can be developed and strengthened over time. Factors that contribute to resilience include having a strong support system, being able to maintain a positive outlook, and having a sense of purpose or meaning in life. The psychology of resilience and coping mechanisms
Coping mechanisms are the strategies that people use to manage stress, anxiety, and other negative emotions. Some common coping mechanisms include exercise, meditation, social support, and therapy. However, not all coping mechanisms are healthy, and some can actually be harmful, such as substance abuse or self-harm. The psychology of resilience and coping mechanisms
It is important to develop healthy coping mechanisms and to build resilience in order to better handle difficult situations in life. This can involve practicing self-care, seeking professional help when needed, and developing a growth mindset that focuses on learning from challenges and setbacks. By building resilience and healthy coping mechanisms, individuals can improve their overall well-being and lead more fulfilling lives.
The psychology of resilience and coping mechanisms
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow