The Rate of Falling in Relation to Physical Exercise Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Rate of Falling in Relation to Physical Exercise Discussion
Please be sure to review the Rubric, below, and all instructions.
The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity to share the results and findings of the EBP process you have been working on throughout the course with your colleagues. This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence of achievement of:
Evaluating scientific literature to be used in clinical, leadership, and policy decision making.
Summarizing scientific evidence related to a practice question.
Designing a plan for implementing scientific evidence into a practice setting including evaluation of outcomes.
Communicating scientific evidence related to practice to relevant stakeholders.
This assignment consists of an oral presentation to members of the class. The presentation should include an introduction, background and significance, definition of the practice problem including your PICO question, a review of current practice, a practice recommendation, an explanation about the evidence-to-practice gap, a plan for knowledge transfer to appropriate stakeholders, and a conclusion. There should be one slide for each of these areas totaling eight slides (not including title slide and references). You will use this template: OTD 701 EBP Presentation PPT (1).pptx
The Rate of Falling in Relation to Physical Exercise Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow