Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
The Risks of Distracted Driving | Brad Gorski | TEDxStanleyPark
First: Watch this speech “The Risks of Distracted Driving”
Second: find a visual that you think will enhance the speech.
· Great places to find pictures are from pexels.com (Links to an external site.) (a royalty & attribution free site…medium size files are typically large enough). Excel works wonders for Graphs, but is a bit more complicated if you have never been in there whereas (BEAM (Links to an external site.)) makes graphs for free (for the price of your email) as well as Canva.com (Links to an external site.). There’s also an incredibly simple option which is from the NCES (Links to an external site.).
Third – Answer these questions: At what part in this speech could use this visual? Why does a visual at that time make sense? Would a visual help the audience remember the speech? Would it clarify or dramatize the message? Would it enhance any persuasive appeal (aka ethos, logos, pathos)? In your post make sure to discuss why your visual would help enhance the speech. Explain your visual and discuss why you chose this particular image.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
The Risks of Distracted Driving