The Scientific Method on Decision Making Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The Scientific Method on Decision Making Essay
The scientific method is useful in problem solving and decision-making in a wide variety of fields. In this assignment, you will demonstrate how to use the scientific method to make decisions and solve problems in your field of study or everyday life.
Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:
Explain the scientific method and describe the overall manner in which you would apply it in your field of study or everyday life.
Identify a specific problem often faced in your field of study or everyday life. Research your problem and assess your data / research. Examples of such problems could be:
Business
Developing a new product that is superior to competitor’s brands; or
Establishing a price for a new product using the law of supply and demand;
Information Systems and Technology
The use of personal electronic devices for work purpose, or
Determining in the most cost-effective computer for your business;
Criminal Justice
The reliability of eyewitness testimony, or
Determining what evidence is revealing to you about a crime;
Everyday life
Selecting a particular brand of detergent, or
Determining the most cost efficient transportation/route for your commute.
Propose one (1) testable hypothesis to explain / solve the problem. State the expected outcomes of your actions and include criteria for determining whether or not these actions would succeed. Note: Your hypothesis should be stated very precisely.
Describe the main actions that you intend to put into place to test your hypothesis that you proposed in Question 3. Describe the way in which you would evaluate the success of your program. Include the results that you would deem as a success and the results that would be considered a failure.
Discuss the wisdom behind the strategy you used to test the hypothesis from Question 4, and describe the additional steps you might take depending on the results of your test. Note: These additional steps might be to revise your original hypothesis (if the results were unsatisfactory) or to propose new hypotheses. The goal is to continuously improve your understanding of the factors influencing your outcomes, to be able to achieve greater results over time.
Use at least two (2) quality resources / references in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and personal blogs do not qualify as quality resources. The body of the paper must have in-text citations that correspond to the references. Integrate all sources into your paper using proper techniques of quoting, paraphrasing and summarizing, along with proper use of in-text citations to credit your sources.
VISION MISSION VALUES TEMPLATE
Dr. Thomas H. Kemp
VISION ELEMENT STUDENT VISION STATEMENT ELEMENT Statement as to what your core business is, for the entity, organization or project you are developing or enhancing (what it is now) Statement as to what your core business will be, for the entity, organization or project you are developing or enhancing (what it will be for the next 3-5 years) Statement as to what your core business should be, for the entity, organization or project you are developing or enhancing (what is should be in its ideal state or condition) MISSION ELEMENT STUDENT MISSION STATEMENT ELEMENT Customer: Who is the customer? What customer needs are met? Where do we conduct our business? How do we conduct our business? Product or services offered: Line of Business Market change: how it will anticipate changes to the market (e.g., customer needs and wants) Technology: Used in production or delivery of services Survival: Growth and profitability potential Management philosophies: Company creed and public image Stakeholders: What/who are our important stakeholders and what are their demands, claims and needs from your line of business Business self-concept: Functional relationships with external environments, perceptions on how society will respond, employee behavior, recognition of past mistakes, constructive conflict resolution, consensus decision making, results orientation, assumed responsibilities, commitment to the long term. VALUES STATEMENT ELEMENTS STUDENT VALUES STATEMENT ELEMENT What are my core values? How will these values inform the vision and mission? How will the values sustain me and the enterprise? What are some examples of the business ethics I will uphold and be accountable for? (E.g., product or service reliability, guarantees to the stakeholders, honesty, fairness in business practices and pricing and truth in advertising, etc.) Values summary
Make sure there is a title page to identify writer, composer and a reference page as needed
The Scientific Method on Decision Making Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow