The US Water Alliance Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
The US Water Alliance Discussion
I’m working on a environmental science question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Each community or location faces water issues specific to its region, related to quantity (too little; flooding; location), quality or future needs. The purpose of this discussion is to investigate water protection
groups or activities that you are concerned about and reflect on what is being done to protect the water in your area.
Task
Search a location that is important to you and find about a water protection group or activity that you feel passionately about.
In your discussion post, please include the following:
- Post the link to either the group website or an article about the group or their activity.
- Write one paragraph about how this group or activity is benefitting the water quality in the area that you chose.
- Consider the following question when you are writing your post: What is being done to protect the water that you care about?
Criteria
Please review the discussion rubric for how you will be assessed on this discussion. needs to be 500 words
Here is an example of what is expected in this discussion
Example discussion post:
- It Takes People: FRk Needs You!
- Drink Up – Shoalie IPA Benefits Flint Riverkeeper
Flint Riverkeeper protects the Flint River by many different efforts. Currently, FrK has partnered with a local brewery in Albany, Georgia called Pretoria Fields to develop a beer called the Shoalie. The name of the
beer is called the Shoalie after the Shoal Bass that has experienced population decline due to dam construction on the Flint River. A portion of the proceeds from each beer purchased goes to the activities of
the Flint Riverkeepers that are keeping this River pristine.
The US Water Alliance Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow