Theatre Restoration Case Study Essay Assignment

Theatre Restoration Case Study Essay Assignment

Instructions:

Theatre Restoration Case Study Essay Assignment

Originally opened in 1930, the Dundas Theatre in Nassau, The Bahamas is a celebrated home to encouraging and assisting the development of various cultural activities in the country. Over time the Dundas needed significant restoration and upgrade required to address its substantial functional deficiencies which made it inadequate to support newer performances. The upgrade required a change to sightlines, seating and flexibility in the delivery of the project to avoid impacting the operation of key annual events, specifically the annual Ring play Show for orphaned children.

The brief required an upgrade of all facilities to integrate back of house production, catering, artist change and warm-up, theatre infrastructure and technologies, commercially supportive facilities, hire-out function spaces and a cafe. The refurbishment needed to respect the heritage value of the original structure while rejuvenating its cultural life as one of Nassau’s traditional venues.

Apart from the original structure, there was significant work done on the building. The new work extends the original footprint, mainly in creating new upper stories. Major areas for refurbishment included replacing the roof damaged by hurricanes through the years, mound remediation, strengthening the foundation and

refinishing all interior and exterior walls and replacing the stage and props. The entire ceiling was replaced with a new cladding system that improved acoustics in the theatre.

The work on this project was conducted so that the theatre remained open during most of the refurbishment.

1. How do you think the use of project management was able to facilitate this?

• Planning – tools, manpower, scheduling
• Gannt diagram – specify dates
• Used phases – smaller projects

2. What processes would have been necessary before the start of the project?

Plan –

Budget – Financial Support Team

Team Leader Timeline

Define deliverables Stakeholders

Risks & mitigation plans

3. Who would be the project stakeholders? Actors & Producers

Theatre goers Construction Companies

City regulators – construction laws Investors/financiers

Project Team PM

Architect Theatre owner Employees Suppliers

4. What was the project scope?

What is included and excluded from the project scope?

strengthening the foundation and refinishing all interior and exterior walls and

replacing the stage and props.

5. What were the project constraints? Must remain open during the work Budget

Time

Manpower – pm, team, suppliers, construction workers

Must retain original building structure for heritage – exterior cannot change

6. What worked well to complete this project?

The work was completed on time in various phases Effective & efficient planning

Deliverables were clearly defined Budget/time respected

Stakeholders were onboard and invested in the project

Theatre Restoration Case Study Essay Assignment

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Theatre Restoration Case Study Essay Assignment

Theatre Restoration Case Study Essay Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!