Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Develop those five critical thinking indicators.
1) effective communication
2) Logical and Intuitive
3) Thinking ahead
4) Realistic and Practical
5) confident
1. the paper must clearly define five critical thinking indicators.
2. The paper includes a complete and thoughtful explanation of why you chose these indicators.
3. The paper must describe a thoughtful and appropriate response to the case study scenario that clearly incorporates critical thinking skills to make decisions.
4. Must have case study for each point or indicators
5. The paper clearly and accurately identifies which of the previously defined critical thinking indicators were used in addressing the case study.
6. Factors that supported and that impacted the ability to think critically were identified and described clearly.
7. Strategies for future improvement were clear and appropriate for the scenario.
8. The paper is in APA format, and all writing is clear and professional, with sources cited and references provided in all cases needed.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
those five critical thinking indicators