Tools and Techniques of Conduct Procurement
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Tools and Techniques of Conduct Procurement
1.) All the below are tools and techniques of conduct procurement, except bidder’s conferences, negotiations, and advertising. analytical techniques, expert judgments, and evaluation techniques. estimates, bidder’s conferences, and evaluation techniques. negotiations, make-or-buy decisions, and advertising.
2. Proper selection criteria are critical for a successful project. All of the below would be considered good selection criteria for a buyer to use to select a seller, except managerial approach of seller, references of seller, and ability of seller to make a reasonable make-or-buy decision. past work done by seller, intellectual property rights, and risk associated with a given seller. technical capability of seller, understanding of work by seller, and business type of seller. financial capacity of seller, overall cost, and warranty offered by seller.
3. Why are the project scope statement and WBS inputs of plan procurement?
4. A seller’s financial capacity is often one of the buyer’s selection criteria. Why is this an important consideration for a buyer?
5.Awards and incentives are commonly used in contracts. Are these simply just two different way of saying the same thing, or are awards and inventive contracts different?
6. Compare and contrast competitive and noncompetitive approaches to contracting.
7. You have been assigned the task of creating an RFP. Your project sponsor insists you do market research before writing the procurement SOW. How might this market research contribute to the procurement SOW?
8. You have received back the bid proposals from prospective sellers. You are ready for source selection. What is source selection, and why is it important
9. What are the five ways that a contract can end? Please provide an example of each.
10. Describe and explain the four processes in the procurement management process from the buyer perspective, as shown in the PMBOK® Guide.
11. You are a potential seller for a large project. You have just exited the bidder’s meeting. What are some items you would likely consider before making your bid or no-bid decision?
12. Fixed-price, cost-reimbursable, and time and material contracts are all potential agreements that could be reached between organizations. Describe each type of contract, and explain the range of risk for each of these types of contracts.
13. You are reviewing procurement models and you notice that there are three types of procurement statements of work. What are the three types of procurement statements of work? When is each appropriate for a given contract?
14. Explain whether procurement documents should be rigorous, flexible, or a combination of the two, and justify your answer.
15. You are the project manager for a major IT project. You believe your contractor in a fixed-price contract is behind schedule. You decide to do an unannounced inspection of the work of the seller on the job site. Would you legally be permitted to do an unannounced inspection of the seller’s work?
16 “The side that does the most research and planning will often come out best in any negotiation.” Do you agree with this statement? Do you disagree with this statement? Defend your position with examples and other information.
17. Under U.S. and international law, all contracts must contain five elements or satisfy five requirements. List and explain each of these five elements.
Tools and Techniques of Conduct Procurement
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow