Touring the Haunted Greenwich Village

June 6, 2022

Touring the Haunted Greenwich Village

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Touring the Haunted Greenwich Village

TOUR MUST BE OF SOMETHING IN New York

PRIMARY RESEARCH

you are to (1) attend any historical walking or virtual tour that is somehow connected to a topic of interest (2) write a description of the tour and what you observed/learned/reflected on using the 6 questions below as a rough guide.

For your assignment, complete the following tasks:

Tell me about: 1) the route/venue, 2) date and time 3) cost if any

A brief description of the historical tour guides’ background, profession and experience.

Describe the historically significant site(s), events or people mentioned.

What is the significance/connection with your particular major or area of interest?

What did you learn?

What was missing from the tour?

MUST BE TWO PAGES

http://www.newyorkhistoricaltours.com/

https://www.nyhistory.org/programs/docent-led-walking-tour-footsteps-through-history-1

http://www.travelchannel.com/interests/history/articles/best-historic-walking-tours-in-new-york

http://www.freetoursbyfoot.com/new-york-tours/walking-tours/

Touring the Haunted Greenwich Village

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met