Types of Reflective Pieces and How Are They Different
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Types of Reflective Pieces and How Are They Different
Due date is wensday at 8:30 AM (5/14/2014)
Portfolio Keeping Part 2 Questions
1- Consider the questions on page 40 for putting together the portfolio assignment.
2- How should you start organizing content when trying to decide what to include in your portfolio? (Pg. 41)
3- What is the difference in navigating a paper portfolio and an ePortfolio? (Pg. 41-42)
4- How can a metaphor guide the reader through a portfolio? (Pg. 42) Is a metaphor something that you are interesting in doing for your portfolio?
5- How should you decide on the qualities of writing the class emphasized? Why is it important to do this? (Pg. 44)
6- Why would a student leave a piece of writing or project out of the portfolio? (Pg. 44)
7- How are the three questions on page 45 helpful for sorting your writing pieces?
8- Why should you not be bored with your portfolio? (Pg. 45)
9- Take down the questions at the end of page 45 about choosing an entry.
10- What does it mean to storyboard a portfolio? (Pg. 45-46)
11- How will the instructor evaluate your work? (Pg. 46)
12-Your job is to demonstrate the relationship between what? (Pg. 46)
13- Why are the first few pages of the portfolio important? (Pg. 46)
14- Why should your best work be towards the front of the portfolio? (Pg. 47)
15- What are the two types of reflective pieces and how are they different? (Pg. 48)
16- What do reflective writing components show? (Pg. 49)
17- Why is the reflective writing component so important for the reader? (Pg.49)
18- How is a portfolio like a final exam? (Pg. 49-50)
19- What does an instructor look for? (Pg. 50)
20- What did the sample metaphors show? (Pg. 51)
21- What is the primary value in portfolio keeping? (Pg. 51)
22- What should and shouldn’t your navigational scheme do? (Pg. 51)
Review the questions on page 51
23- How does understanding the instructor help? (Pg. 52)
24- What does it mean to revise an essay? (Pg. 53)
25-What did Farah discover about revision? (Pg. 53)
26- What is key to your success? (Pg. 54)
27- What is editing? (Pg. 54)
28- How is revision different from editing? (Pg. 55)
29- What is proofreading? (Pg. 55)
30- How is proofreading different from editing? (Pg. 55)
31- What is the difference between a mistake and an error? (Pg. 55-56)
32- What are the three suggestions for editing and proofreading your paper or portfolio? (Pg. 56)
33- What are some specific things to look for in editing and proofreading a portfolio? (Pg. 57)
34- Why are portfolios never static? (Pg. 58)
After you put answers for all those questions. I will have another homework about portfolio 1 and 2 to work one essay and you will see some puciturs for the next essay.
Types of Reflective Pieces and How Are They Different
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow