Types of Sanctions and Designing Sanctions review
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Types of Sanctions and Designing Sanctions review
Visit UNSanctionsApp.com and answer the following questions:
- Review the Types of Sanctions and Designing Sanctionssection of the app about sanctions and answer the following:
What are the most common objectives of UN sanctions? ____
What is the most common type of sanction? ___
What is the average time it takes to implement sanctions after noting a threat? ___
How often are sanctions effective in getting states to change their behavior? ____
How often do sanctions have unintended consequences ________? What is the most common of these ________?
- Review the Sanctions Checklist: Core elements: Targets sectionin the Designing Sanctions section of the App:
What are 3 examples of targets for sanctions?
What are 3 ways that countries try to evade sanctions?
- Choose two cases from “Cases and Episodes”. Find out why sanctions were imposed, what the sanctions were and what the effect was and summarize your findings.
- Based on what you’ve read, did anything surprise you? How do you evaluate the usefulness of sanctions as a tool of foreign policy?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results