Undertaking Educational Enquiry
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
The formative assignments are much more informal than has been the case on previous modules they are more like an ongoing conversation than a form of assessment and it is likely that several iterations of these conversations may happen as the project takes shape.
With this in mind …..
As it stands your current design aims to link attendance at extra-curricula activities with school performance. I think this might be difficult to show. It may be that those who choose to go to these activities are already the most motivated and higher performers or those who already have more home support thus any advantage you discover may not be so much about the activity as about those who go anyway. There is an easy way to resolve this however and that is to link attendance to perceptions of their value and not performance per se.
So your main questions become
1. How are out-of-school activities perceived to influence students academic success?
2. How much variety is there in the views of parents, teachers, and students?The main aim might be: To enable a school leadership team to promote attendance at extra-curricular activities in light of how they are valued by different stakeholders
Sub-questions might be:
· Which out-of-school activities are attended and why?
· What links are made between these activities and school learning?
· Are these activities seen to have value beyond their relevance to academic learning?
· How do the views of teachers, parents and students vary in relation to these perspectives?This data might be gathered through a questionnaire to a wider cohort and perhaps (if there is time) 3 focus groups each made up of a small sample (e.g. 4) of teachers, parents and students. Thus your supplementary data takes a more central role the main data set (the questionnaire) will still be quantitative data and the additional focus group data will illustrate how these views are articulated.
You dont need to spend a lot of time rewriting anything.
The only thing you need to do is adapt the ethics form and letters of consent to this slightly different emphasis on perceptions rather than performance.
This is a two pages order. If you need more space for, please let me know and I will add it, no problem.
Thank you very much for your hard work.
YCPS’ Do not mind about the number of sources.. it is just 1 because of computer input requirements.vc
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Undertaking Educational Enquiry
Undertaking Educational Enquiry