Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Value Creation and Competitive Advantage
Overview
The situations you faced and the decisions you made in the simulation may have affected the company’s success in obtaining a competitive advantage over the market. As you have learned in this module, opportunity-based thinking is critical to blue ocean strategy (BOS). For a business to achieve success through BOS, its leader must have the right mindset and ask deeper questions to hopefully remove bias and false boundaries from their judgment.
Prompt
In this journal, you will reflect on whether and how your decisions in the simulation aligned with blue ocean strategy principles, innovation, and competitive advantage.
Discuss your opportunity-focused mindset during the simulation by answering the questions below:
Value creation and competitive advantage: How do you think the company did regarding value creation and gaining a competitive advantage across generations?
Thought process: Did you “think differently” while you made your decisions in the simulation? Explain why or why not.
Discovery: What have you discovered or learned after completing the first round of the simulation?
Guidelines for Submission
Submit a Word document of one to two pages using 12-point Times New Roman, one-inch margins, and double spacing. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
Module Two Journal Rubric
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Value Creation and Competitive Advantage Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Discusses how the company did regarding value creation and gaining a competitive advantage across generations Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include discussion that disregards value creation or competitive advantage Does not attempt criterion 30
Thought Process Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Explains the use of the “think differently” process while decisions were made in the simulation Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include cursory or incomplete explanations Does not attempt criterion 25
Discovery Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Explores what was discovered or learned after completing the first round of the simulation Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explanations that are lacking in depth and detail or are cursory in general Does not attempt criterion 25
Articulation of Response Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas 10
Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution 10
Total: 100%
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Value Creation and Competitive Advantage |
Value Creation and Competitive Advantage