Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
vision and value for your brand of performance consulting
Discussion 1: Reflection and Shared Practice
Each week you will have the opportunity to learn, practice, and then assess your knowledge through readings, lectures, discussion forums, and assignments or tests. Not all of these activities are graded, but ALL are important to your success in this course. Please take the time to carefully review the reading material and lectures, as they will ultimately contribute to your ability to complete assignments and discuss the week’s content with your fellow classmates.
Upon successful completion of this week’s lesson, you should be prepared to:
- Define your vision and value for your brand of performance consulting
- Build a portfolio of products and services that you have already delivered
To prepare for this Discussion:
Please select the link below to open and view this week’s lecture:
In addition, please read the following articles:
Performance Consultant Handbook – Bookshelf Ambassadored: The Performance Consultant’s Fieldbook (vitalsource.com)
McCabe, L., & Lindsay, M. (2018). The Big Four’s leap of faith: The Big Four are developing capabilities far beyond accounting and auditing. How did they upturn the consulting business? Acuity, 5(1), 32–37. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=128936572&site=ehost-live
Oldham, B. (2018). Performance consulting: The ideal tool for ensuring a project adds real value. Human Resources Magazine, 23(1), 22–23. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=130464636&site=ehost-live
Assignment:
Respond to at least two of your peers’ postings in one or more of the following ways:
- Share an insight about what you learned from having read your peers’ postings and discuss how and why your peer’s posting resonated with you professionally and personally.
- Offer an example from your experience or observation that validates what your peer discussed.
- Offer specific suggestions that will help your peer build upon his or her own virtual communication.
- Offer further assessment or insight that could impact your peer’s future communications.
- Share how something your peer discussed changed the way you view things.
- 3 – 4 paragraph response per each colleagues
- No plagiarism
- APA citing
Bottom of Form
1st Colleague – Dorian
Discussion 2 – Week 1
Dorian Wilson
Top of Form
Using the articles; The Big Four’s leap of faith: The Big Four are developing capabilities far beyond accounting and auditing. How did they upturn the consulting business? by McCabe & Lindsay (2018) and Performance consulting: The ideal tool for ensuring a project adds real value by Oldham (2018), please review the eight steps that are outlined for performance consulting.
The 8 Steps of the Strategic Performance Plan are getting prepared is getting the items and team members to gather information that will make the planning process go smooth. clarify the mission and vision statements to let others know your mission and what you have in store for your company. Identifying your current and future market positions by retrieving information that distinguish your weakness and strengths. Agree on priorities, with in your group or team the planning process should be a group decision. Putting the plan together, getting the plan ready to be challenged, distribute tasks, and assign actions, giving assignments and responsibilities amongst the team. Roll out the plan, by making the first official run of the plan. And making everyone accountable for their actions. The 9th strategic performance plan is Future visions.
The additional step would be to ensure a more robust strategic performance plan by, examining the over all strategies and assuring that all the steps combined will be successful. By staying on top of it as a leader it is best to have strategies for the future as well to bounce on for the long run. The rationale and outline where the additional step would fall in the plan would be, after the plan is rolled out, then there is the time to learn about future plans and even back up plans in case some parts or all of the original plan fails.
References: McCabe, L., & Lindsay, M. (2018). The Big Four’s leap of faith: The Big Four are developing capabilities far beyond accounting and auditing. How did they upturn the consulting business? Acuity, 5(1), 32-37.
Oldham, B. (2018). Performance consulting: The ideal tool for ensuring a project adds real value. Human Resources Magazine, 23(1), 22–23. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=130464636&site=ehost-live
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
2nd Colleague – Susan Christmas
Discussion 2 – Week 1
Susan Christmas
Top of Form
Summary Addendum to the 8 Steps of the Strategic Performance Plan
Step one of the strategic performance plan is to step back and truly look at the reality of what is going on so you can focus on revealing the actual problem. Step two begins with discovering the ideal scenario for the organization then stepping back and determining the actual situation. The ideal scenario and actual situation will then be compared, and the differences will be determined. Step three involves a continuation of digging into the cause of the challenges facing the organization and then exploring the solutions that will give the organization their ideal scenario. Step four involves reporting the findings to the stakeholders of the organization and remaining flexible when the stakeholders reveal new information. Step five is making sure there is a plan for measuring success and determining when to check for that success. Step six is for designing and delivering your solutions while bearing in mind the goals of the organization. Step seven is measuring success by first gathering the baseline then measuring the outcome. Step eight is determining how to report the impact of the project and involving stakeholders so they can determine how to sustain the changes (Oldham, 2018).
Addition of 9th Step, Rationale, and Outline of Where 9th Step Falls in the Plan
If I were to add a 9th step to make a more robust strategic performance plan it would be Reassessment. Reassessment would help to ensure the implementation of the plan is meeting the goals of the organization and the stakeholders understand they can tweak the interventions further to cover all the gaps. You cannot expect an organization to just implement changes, report impacts of the changes over a certain period of time, and then walk away after the predetermined amount of time has passed. The rationale is that things are always changing, and plans need tweaked accordingly. Reassessment is an ongoing process that involves revisiting the 8 previous steps to ensure there is continuous improvement. My addition of a 9th step would fall at the end of the existing steps so it would actually be the 9th step in the list.
Viewpoints on Critical Difference
I believe the last bullet point is in reference to The Big Four article, but I do not have a clear understanding of the question. I am not sure what critical differences I should be comparing. With that in mind, I understand The Big Four began as accounting firms, but when the US passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 it opened the door for these firms to diversify into consulting businesses. These firms did most of their diversification by acquiring other firms with specific specialties. Many companies choose to hire consultants so they can find opportunities for the organization or to help them create efficiencies. The Big Four goes beyond just providing suggestions and actually provides ideas for how to implement techniques (McCabe & Lindsay, 2018). I look forward to reading the posts of others so I can better understand this question.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results