why the ad used rhetorical strategy
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
why the ad used rhetorical strategy
Essay #2 Peer Review Questions
Your Name:
Writer you are reviewing:
1) In the box below, copy and paste what you believe the thesis statement to be.
Rate the strength of the thesis from 1-10 (ten being the highest rating) and share with him or her why the rating was given.
Points to think about:
- Does the thesis discuss how the ad delivers it’s point of view (the rhetorical strategy)?
- Does the author not only mention what the ad is selling but what idea the ad is selling?
My Response:
2) Rate the description of the image on a scale from 1-10.
Consider these questions in your rating:
- Are the descriptions useful to the analysis?
- Are the descriptions specific and use creative language?
- Are the descriptions easy to follow and organized?
My Response:
3) Rate the analysis of the image on a scale from 1-10.
Consider these questions in your rating:
- Does the author analyze specific components (rhetorical strategies) of the advertisement?
- Does the author speculate as to why the ad used this rhetorical strategy?
My Response:
4) Copy and paste or specifically indicate at least one sentence that is confusing to you because of its grammar and flow – even if you aren’t sure what the error is. Please explain why you have marked this sentence as one that needs improvement.
My Response:
5) Ask your classmate one question you have about the essay.
My Response:
Save this document with the following naming convention:
FirstName LastName PR2 Reviewed Name
For example: Megan Howard PR2 John Smith
why the ad used rhetorical strategy
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results