Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Wind Turbine Power Energy Source Brochure
You are the head of research and development for an energy company. You are branching out to the community to sell your ideas for what you think is the best energy source for my company to use.
I, Mr. Gellar, am the head of a large, energy guzzling company who needs a vast supply of cheap energy. I am looking at proposals from various energy companies to choose which type of energy will be right for my company. (Nuclear, Hydroelectric, Solar, Geothermal, Wind, Biomass, Coal, Petroleum, Natural Gas, Hydrogen Fuel Cells)
Your job—You will choose one type of energy resource, research it and create a brochure to “sell” me on selecting your type of energy. Your research will be completed below. You need at least 3 references. From your research, you will create a brochure using Google slides or another program that allows you to create a digital brochure. You may draw, paint, use computer generated illustrations, or reference images you find online. A folded or tri-fold brochure is one of the requirements. Use your imagination but use research to back up your claims!
Research form and Rubric for the Energy Brochure (Links to an external site.)
Brochure for your use –Tri-Fold Brochure (Links to an external site.)
To help you choose which resource to do you brochure on: What Are Our Energy Choices? (Links to an external site.)
Helpful Links:
Nuclear (Links to an external site.) Hydroelectric (Links to an external site.) Solar (Links to an external site.) Geothermal (Links to an external site.) Wind (Links to an external site.)
Biomass (Links to an external site.) Coal (Links to an external site.) Petroleum (Links to an external site.) Natural Gas (Links to an external site.) Hydrogen Fuel Cells (Links to an external site.)
View Rubric
Wind Turbine Power Energy Source Brochure
Some Rubric | ||
Some Rubric | ||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
DESIGN & PLANNING
view longer description |
10 pts
Full Marks 7 pts Good Marks 5 pts Major Errors 0 pts Missing |
/ 10 pts |
Generation of Energy
view longer description |
25 pts
Full Marks 20 pts Good Marks 15 pts Incomplete 10 pts Major Errors 0 pts Missing |
/ 25 pts |
Benefits
view longer description |
25 pts
Full Marks 20 pts Good Marks 15 pts Incomplete 10 pts Major Errors 0 pts Missing |
/ 25 pts |
Drawbacks
view longer description |
20 pts
Full Marks 15 pts Good Marks 10 pts Incomplete 5 pts Major Errors 0 pts Missing |
/ 20 pts |
Images
view longer description |
10 pts
Full Marks 7 pts Good Marks 5 pts Incomplete 0 pts Missing |
/ 10 pts |
References
view longer description |
10 pts
Full Marks 5 pts Incomplete 0 pts Missing |
/ 10 pts |
Total Points: 0 |
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Wind Turbine Power Energy Source Brochure |
Wind Turbine Power Energy Source Brochure