Writing Complex Statements Taken from Web Resources Solution

October 1, 2022

Writing Complex Statements Taken from Web Resources

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Writing Complex Statements Taken from Web Resources

Discussion 8:

Due: Please post your initial discussion No later than Thursday or Friday of this week. (80 Points)

Due :Peer/Classmate review/comment: Provide comments to at least 2 class members No later than Friday or Saturday of this week. Please mention the classmate/s name.(20 points)

Please take a few minutes and check the discussion board on Sunday and make sure to reply to peer comments OR my comments/query.

Please read IGU Grading Rubric and late participation grading policy for discussion posted under policy section course modules.

Discussion Topic

Please read Chapter 22, and review PP slides and reputable articles/journals and in your own words discuss:

What is Risk Management? And provide at least one example of project, product, and business risks.

Note: You do not need to write complex statements taken from web resources. This is a discussion and you will earn better grade if you compose the discussion in your own words and correct grammar based on reading chapter 22 and reputable articles.

GU Requirement: students are required to provide at least one supporting reference

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met