Zimbardo Standford Prison Experiment Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Zimbardo Standford Prison Experiment Discussion
For this week’s discussion, you will need to watch the Zimbardo – Stanford Prison Experiment Documentary (in the Week 2 folder).
In your discussion post (400 words), please include the following:
Provide a summary of how the experiment was conducted.
Identify as many ethical issues as you can from the video.
How could you lessen the ethical concerns you identified if you were to do a similar study today?
Do you think the knowledge gained from a study like this is worth any potential harm to the subject?
POL SCI 21a Polarization of The Parties Discussion
I’m working on a social science writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Pro: The polarization of the two major parties in recent decades has been a positive development for American democracy given that voters are now being offered a much clearer choice. For democracy to work, voters need to know what the differences are between the parties and policy differences are now clearer for all to see.
Con: Polarization of the parties has been harmful to American democracy. The differences between the parties are now too great and have even resulted in some political violence. Furthermore, there is too little possibility for sensible moderates in the electorate to be represented by our national political leaders.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Zimbardo Standford Prison Experiment Discussion
Zimbardo Standford Prison Experiment Discussion