Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Your final case study writing assignment will involve taking your blog entry and turning it into a case study.
1) Use either the Potter Box format.
Use the proper headings in your paper.
2) Using your blog topic, describe the situation and CLEARLY STATE the ethical dilemma.
3) Explain which professional values are involved in this case.
4) Select one ethical theory of your choice to apply to the case–of using the Potter Box, include loyalties with the heading.
5) Explain how the case was resolved (if it has been resolved) OR explain how the case should be resolved if it is still in progress.
Update it from the time you wrote your blog if additional developments are available. (This will serve as your critical thinking paragraph, as well.)
FOR THIS CASE, YOU WILL CITE YOUR SOURCES IN YOUR COPY (SUCH AS: According to a NY Times article published in April….) AND THEN LIST YOUR SOURCES AT THE END OF YOUR PAPER. Use this format: Author, Title of article, Publication name, Retrieved on a date, and list URL. Example:
Smith, John. “The Chicken Wars,” Adweek. Retrieved from www.adweek.com/thechickenwars/. ;
Be sure that if you use any photos or illustrations that you provide the source!
BEFORE YOU ASK: YOU CAN CHOOSE A TOPIC OTHER THAN YOUR BLOG TOPIC IF YOU WISH, BUT BE SURE TO CHECK WHAT ERRORS YOU MADE ON YOUR BLOG BEFORE YOU WRITE THIS PAPER.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |