Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Overview: You will choose an issue or event in diversity for the first half of your final project, the critical analysis portfolio, and critically assess it using the four general education lenses: history, humanities, natural and practical sciences, and social sciences. You will gain insight into how the intersectional nature of diversity influences society, as well as your own individual framework of perception and the choices, attitudes, and behaviors of others in the world around you, by viewing the issue or event through these lenses.
You will evaluate your issue/event in diversity through the lenses of natural and practical sciences, as well as the social sciences, for this fourth milestone, which is due in Module Six. This job, like Milestone Two, allows you to delve deeper into your analysis of the issue/event through these two lenses. This will provide you the opportunity to practice examining your problem/event via these lenses and receive feedback on your efforts.
Prompt: Examine your work from Modules 5 and 6, as well as the Four Lenses document from Module 1.
Then, using the natural and applied sciences as a lens, examine your issue/event by pondering the following questions:
How does this issue/event use natural and applied sciences to make a social statement?
In what ways may science assist you in resolving or improving your problem or event?
Then, using the social sciences as a lens, examine your issue/event and respond to the following:
What impact does this issue/event have on societal issues when viewed through the lens of the social sciences?
In what ways does the social science lens assist you in articulating a better understanding of the social issue(s) that are at the heart of your issue/event?
Note: You’re working on two independent analyses, one in natural and applied sciences and the other in social sciences. Two papers must be submitted in a single Word document.
Make sure to back up your claims with scientific proof. To support your responses, consult the course materials, the LibGuide for this course, and any other relevant resources. With the instructor’s permission, current news sources may be used. Part one of the Final Project should include instructor feedback.
The following key elements must be handled in particular:
I. Lens Evaluation: You will analyze your issue/event using two of the four general education lenses in this area of your assignment.
A. Examine your problem/event through the perspective of natural and applied sciences to see how it affects different institutions. To back up your argument, use research evidence.
B. Examine your problem/event through the lens of the social sciences to see how it affects different institutions. To back up your argument, use research evidence.
Submission Guidelines based on the Rubric: Milestone Four should be submitted as a single Word document containing two documents. The complete submission should be between two and four pages long. Double-space your text and use a 12-point Times New Roman font with one-inch margins. At least two sources from the specified course resources or other academic sources located independently via the Shapiro Library should be used to support your responses for each lens. Use the APA citation style to cite your supporting sources.
Please keep in mind that the grading rubric for this milestone submission differs from the final project’s. There will be an extra “Exemplary” category in the Final Project Part One Rubric that will provide advise on how to go above and beyond “Proficient” in your final submission, as well as additional areas to address.
The Crucial Elements Expertise (100 percent ) Needs Enhancement (75 percent ) It’s not obvious (0 percent ) Value
Natural and Applied Sciences Lens Analysis
Analyzes a topic or occurrence through the lens of natural and applied sciences to determine its impact on various institutions, based on research findings.
Analyzes a topic or occurrence using natural and applied sciences, yet the analysis is superficial or irrational, and the supporting evidence is insufficient or nonexistent.
Does not examine the issue/event through the lens of natural and applied sciences, relying on research evidence to back up interpretation.
40
Social Sciences: A Closer Look
Uses evidence from research to support examination of an issue/event through the lens of the social sciences in order to determine its impact on various organizations.
Analyzes a problem or occurrence through the lens of social science, yet the analysis is superficial or irrational, and the supporting data is insufficient or nonexistent.
Does not examine the issue/event through the perspective of the social sciences, relying on research evidence to back up analysis.
40
Response Articulation There are no severe problems in the citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization of the submission.
Major errors in citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or structure have a negative impact on reading and articulation of primary ideas in the submission.
Critical flaws in citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or arrangement limit understanding of concepts in the submission.
20
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Analyzing a Diversity Issue or Event |
Analyzing a Diversity Issue or Event