Animal Studies of Complex Mental Abilities Final essay 1
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
Discussion 3 – Animal Studies of Complex Mental Abilities
Some behavioral researchers study the complex mental abilities of other species. For example, the language capacity of chimpanzees has been the subject of intense scientific scrutiny (and debate) for decades. Other topics in animal research include counting, tool use, and problem solving. Why do researchers study these abilities in other species? Can such studies reveal anything of importance about complex mental abilities in humans? And if researchers use animals in research, what ethical or moral obligations do they have toward the animals?
In this Discussion, you will opine on your belief about animals and awareness and compare that to the awareness of humans. You will also comment on the ethical implications of animal research.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Think about whether or not you believe that animals actually have an awareness of their actions, given what you have read.
Consider the ethics involved in such animal research. What do you see as its value? Are there good reasons for conducting such research? How would you justify it?
With these thoughts in mind:
Post your thoughts about whether or not animals are conscious or aware of their actions. First, describe what you mean by aware or conscious. These terms have many meanings, so it would be good to be clear about how you are using the term.
Then, based on the Learning Resources, describe higher cognitive functions in animals in terms of language, learning and memory, tool use, planning, or other similar functions. What do these functions in animals tell us about higher cognitive functions in humans? Justify your answer by referencing the scientific literature and this weeks Learning Resources.
Then, weigh in on the value and ethics of conducting animal research on complex mental abilities. Again, explain and justify your responses with references to the scientific literature and this weeks Learning Resources.
Resources –
Joffe, A. R., Bara, M., Anton, N., & Nobis, N. (2016). The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America. BMC Medical Ethics, 17, 17.
Animal Studies of Complex Mental Abilities Final essay 1
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Animal Studies of Complex Mental Abilities Final essay 1