Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Paper details:
(See: http://www.naeyc.org/tyc/article/preschoolers-as-abstract-artists) 1. Pick an artist. Show examples to children (or young adults, friends etc.) of the artists work (i.e., photographs) and have them discuss the pictures (the numbers of pieces would depend on the age and number of participants).
2. Discuss the creative project how did the artist create the art? How would you do it, what materials do you need?
3. Have the participants make the art, using a medium of your choice (i.e., photographs, paint, recycled objects, etc…). Be sure to let the participants create the art and guide the process (you can provide the simple materials, or have the participants collect them – open ended, everyday materials such as objects from nature or household items work well!)
4. Document the process along the way (take observational notes, photographs where possible, etc…): Note participants questions and conversations as they discuss the art they are exploring Note their insights about the creative project Record their process as they create the art
5. The finished product: Write a one-page summary/reflection about what you learned through the process. For instance, what did the participants discussion focus on as they worked? What, if anything, struck you as they engaged in the process? How might this work in the classroom?
Art project Discussion of Pictures
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Art project Discussion of Pictures |
Art project Discussion of Pictures