Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Paper details:
Article #1- Wallace, P. (2017, March 18). 6 Tips for Designing the Perfect Workspace. Retrieved from Entrepeneur.com: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/290158 Article #2- Pinola, M. (2016, June 19). Productivity and Ergonomics: The Best Way to Organize Your Desk. Retrieved from Zapier.com: https://zapier.com/blog/how-to-set-up-your-desk/ Article #3- Stillman, J. (2018, July 9). New Harvard Study: Your Open-Plan Office Is Making Your Team Less Collaborative.
Retrieved from inc.com: https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/new-harvard-study-you-open-plan-office-is-making-your-team-less-collaborative.html Describe your personal working environment and compare and contrast the limitations and delimitations of working there (both professional and personal working spaces are encouraged) as related to the articles, videos, and any other element you discover. There are no correct or incorrect answers; this process is designed to help you assess what elements are most important to you.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Building the Strategic Nest Essay |
Building the Strategic Nest Essay