Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Cmplc Assignment and Policy Legal Ethics
Quiz #6
Fill in the blanks with at least five sentences for each of these questions: Include the question and assign a number to each of your responses. Each answer should have a citation.
1. What do copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret all refer to?
2. What is the legal status of intellectual property?
3. Why did late-twentieth-century copyright rules grow increasingly stringent and punishable?
What is the Fair Use Doctrine, and how does it apply to you?
5. Make a case for allowing music or software to be copied legally.
6. Do the books on my Kindle belong to me or do they belong to someone else? Why can’t I transfer them if I have ownership? What are my legal rights to them if I don’t own them?
7. What was the case against Sony in the United States Supreme Court in 1984?
8. Did Napster have any responsibility for its users’ actions?
9. In the Rio case, why did the judge rule in Diamond’s favor?
Digital Rights Management (DRM) is a term that refers to the management of digital rights.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Cmplc Assignment and Policy Legal Ethics |
Cmplc Assignment and Policy Legal Ethics