Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion about the Bathsheba Syndrome
Have you ever pondered why people who have risen to the top, such as General Petraeus and Harvey Weinstein, fail and fall?
Were they always evil individuals, or did a perfect storm of interconnected elements bring them down?
How do we keep top-level executives from acting unethically and pulling the rest of the company down with them?
To finish this topic, read The Bathsheba Syndrome: Successful Leaders’ Ethical Failure. Then, in your first post, respond to the following:
What happened to King David if virtue or good character is a desirable habit, as Aristotle claims?
How can we predict which leaders are likely to succumb to the Bathsheba Syndrome when we choose them?
In the Ring of Gyges, you looked at the concept of unrestrained power in Module 2. What makes this unique? Would you have responded the same way if you were in King David’s shoes?
View the Discussion Rubric document to ensure a successful completion of this assignment.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion about the Bathsheba Syndrome |
Discussion about the Bathsheba Syndrome