Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Look for an accident or event involving a general aviation aircraft (Links to an external site.) that was caused in part by poor flight planning. When looking for accident summaries and reports, try utilizing keywords relevant to the procedures involved in flight planning.
Create a compelling three-paragraph first post that covers the following topics:
Paragraph 1: Based on your investigation, briefly characterize the aircraft accident in your own words. Highlight the causes of the accident in your summary based on the findings of the accident investigation.
Paragraph 2: Discuss one or more ways in which the article is directly related to the science of flight planning topics taught in this module.
Paragraph 3: Share your thoughts on the significance and relevance of the summarized accident or occurrence, as well as the value of flight planning in general, by sharing personal perspectives or experiences.
At least one picture or video should be included to help depict any aspect of your initial post conversation.
Discussion assignment on Flight Planning
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion assignment on Flight Planning |
Discussion assignment on Flight Planning