Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion of Social Structure Theory
For DQ 1, a minimum of four recent scholarly peer-reviewed articles less than five years old must be cited using APA style 750 words for each topic. For DQ 2, a minimum of three recent scholarly peer-reviewed articles less than five years old must be cited using APA format 750 words for each topic. DQ1 and DQ2 are two different types of questions. Please include the url or DOI for any sources used in this section. Note: Please see the reading references below:
1st DQ
Assume you’re working as a forensic psychologist. Would you be more inclined to believe in social structure theory or social process theory? Please explain why.
DQ No. 2
Explain which aspect of Hirschi’s social bond you believe you have the weakest. Which do you believe you have the most of?
Please take note of the following reading materials for the week:
1. Read Introduction to Criminology: Why Do They Do It? Chapters 8, 9, and 10.
URL:
https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/sage/2020/introduction-to-criminology why-do-they-do-it 3e.php
2. Watch the documentary “Aggression: Is Violence Learned?” In Films on Demand,
(2013).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://digital.films.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?aid=12129&xtid=53755
3. From Social? Forces, read Heimer’s “Socioeconomic Status, Subcultural Definitions, and Violent Delinquency” (1997).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9704205035&site=ehost-live&scope=site
4. Read Social Structure and Delinquency: Mediation or Moderation? Verrill’s contribution (2008).
URL:
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/detail.action?docID=3016856
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion of Social Structure Theory |
Discussion of Social Structure Theory