Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion of the Workplace Assignment
You must complete the following stages in order to pass this assessment: Select a department or team within your current workplace. Spend a week observing the communication style and method in use. In Mahara, keep track of your observations and field notes. Request that at least 5 coworkers debate and note their responses to the following questions: What do you think the reason is why denial is so common in the healthcare field when it comes to stress among physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals?
What comes to mind when you hear the terms “burnout,” “compassion fatigue,” and “chronic secondary stress”? How do they relate to your own life? What are the most concerning concerns for you?
Which ones do you have the most experience with?
What aspects of your self-care routine have shown to be the most useful to you?
What are the bare minimums?
What is the most difficult aspect of your self-care efforts for you?
What are some of the “poor behaviors” of people you work with that you don’t want to emulate?
5. Examine your colleagues’ responses to the questions and look for common ‘themes’ – watch the video below to learn a quick and easy way for thematic analysis. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time continue=1&v=KUZ6iGvJlGI&feature=emb title
6. Compare your theme analysis to the field notes you took throughout your observation week.
7. Make a case for the level of resilience among HCP in the area you evaluated. – Things to Remember When Taking Field Notes: – When and where important communications occur – Voice tonality – Body language – Work quantity and quality – Interactions with supervisor – Resistance to change in practice or conduct – Management outside of the hierarchy
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Discussion of the Workplace Assignment