Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Examine the data charts from the government report, which can be found at https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/poll-finding/kff-health-tracking-poll-late-february-2021/sion/. (This is a link to another website.) Lunna Lopes, Audrey Kearney, Ashley Kirzinger, Liz Hamel, and Mollyann Brodie released KFF Health Tracking Poll: Economic Hardship, Health Coverage, And The ACA on March 3, 2021.
Please respond to the following questions:
What has happened as a result of the pandemic? What are the primary approval trends for the present administration’s response to the pandemic?
What were people’s health-care concerns during the pandemic? Is their current health-care status making them happy or unhappy? Are they leaning toward change or maintaining the status quo?
Why are these individuals’ health-care concerns deemed more essential than other health-care concerns? Explain
As a policymaker, if you were asked to forecast what will happen to healthcare costs and insurance premiums over the next five years, what would you predict and why? Consider the necessity for long-term healthcare and the pandemic’s impacts.
Discussion on Social and Economic Lives
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on Social and Economic Lives |
Discussion on Social and Economic Lives