Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Questions for SOC372 Social Work
Describe how the discipline of social work differs from other social sciences (psychology, sociology, anthropology). Compare and contrast the various levels (micro, meso, and macro) at which social workers work. Identify and explain the social worker’s function in each situation.
Within the discipline of social work, you can choose between two alternative career routes. Explain the educational requirements for each of the two vocations, both for entry and advancement. Explain whether you believe the educational requirements are enough for the roles played by people in both professions. Please explain why.
O. W. Farley, L. L. Smith, and S. W. Boyle (2011). An overview of social work (12th ed.). Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, ISBN-13: 9780205001972
URL:
http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/pearson/2011/introduction-to-social-work ebook 12e.php
Read Bent-“Social Goodley’s Work: A Profession of Power, Passion, and Purpose” from Social Work (2014).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=96949093&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read Gitterman’s article “Social Work: A Profession in Search of Its Identity” in the Journal of Social Work Education (2014).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=100485598&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read Silverman’s article “The Branding of a Profession: Time to Reflect” from Social Work (2012).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=84396455&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read Donaldson, Hill, Ferguson, Fogel, and Erickson’s article “Contemporary Social Work Licensure: Implications for Macro Social Work Practice and Education” in Social Work Today (2014).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=94394052&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read Lord & Iudice’s article “Social Workers in Private Practice: A Descriptive Study of What They Do” in Clinical Social Work Journal (2012).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ofs&AN=70351165&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Graham and Shier’s article “Profession and Workplace Expectations of Social Workers: Implications for Social Worker Subjective Well-Being” from Journal of Social Work Practice is worth reading (2014).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=94254397&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read Boland’s article “Raoul Wallenberg: His Lessons for the Social Work Profession” in Social Work (2014).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=94394060&site=ehost-live&scope=site
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Discussion Questions for SOC372 Social Work