EC3016 International Economics Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
EC3016 International Economics Assignment
The task:
The Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute (SPERI) blog (http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/category/blog/) is one of the major blog outlets for political economy research. Your task is to write an assessment as if you are writing for the SPERI blog.
You will be expected to address the following question: “In your view, what is a pressing issue in the global economy? Explain why, and justify your answer.”
We recommend that you select a topic that is related to one of the Independent Tasks such as US-China trade wars, global value chains, global care networks, etc.
You cannot select a topic that you have already discussed or plan to discuss in your critical reflections.
If you would like develop your own original approach to the assignment and set your own question and topic, then you are welcome to but you must clear this with your seminar tutor first via email or office hours appointment.Why are we asking you to do this?
The aim is to test your ability to analyze the global economy, while giving you some freedom to write about a topic that has inspired and piqued your interest.
We think that developing these kinds of skills is very important and useful from an employability perspective. This assessment is designed to complement the more theoretical portfolio assessment, as well as your other modules and the research-intensive dissertation.What are we expected to do in the EC3016 International Economics Assignment?
The assessment will take the format of a blogpost (or newspaper opinion-editorial, an op-ed, if you prefer). While brief, we still expect you to combine the kind of thoughtful research and rigor normally associated with academic work, with a snappy, concise and persuasive argument.
This means you will still need to research and read around the topic as you would for a normal essay, but you need to write for a broader (albeit imagined) audience (see below).
You should refer to other sources and pieces of evidence, which may include data tables, graphs etc. You may also refer to course material, or other academic sources you have collected. Please refer to those sources using footnotes rather than in-text links.
You do not need to use “theory” per se as you would in a normal essay as the format is a blogpost with a different intended audience, but you may want to develop an analytical or conceptual angle to your assessment so long as you can communicate this appropriately.
EC3016 International Economics Assignment
What does a good blogpost look like?
The SPERI blog has some guidance, some of which is useful for our purposes:
“The SPERI blog is a platform to share new political economy research, expertise and analysis.”
“We are keen to publish blogs that address a wide range of complex and long-term political-economic issues.”
“We ask that blogs are written in an accessible language that can be understood by the SPERI blog’s broad audience of the general public, policymakers, civil society organizations, academics and students.”
“We do not publish blogs that are longer than 1000 words.”
You should consider this carefully — especially on you intended (albeit imagined) audience and the importance of being accessible but not simplistic.
SPERI blogposts often has the feel of an op-ed, where the key element is persuasion. The very phrase “op-ed” means opposite the editorial page of a newspaper – i.e. the “opinion” or “comment pages” – which is where columnists have traditionally outlined and rehearsed arguments that illuminated the issues of the day.
A piece of writing like this is characterized by four qualities, all of which important skills for political economists, both academically and vocationally:
It is highly informative: it manages to distil rapidly a large amount of information that may be inaccessible – often because it is too technical to be appreciated by non-experts – to everyday audiences, and explains it to them in a simple (but not simplistic/superficial) way.
It is original: a good SPERI blog post has an analysis to share. In other words, it advances a clear argument.
It builds that argument logically: it defends or extends on the basis of a set of clear contentions.
It supports those arguments drawing upon well-thought out pieces of evidence, even if some may be anecdotal in nature.How will these blogposts be assessed?
See the criteria below.How do I reference?
While it is important to read and research for this assessment as you would for any of your other essays on your MA, you do not need to use formal referencing for this particular assessment. That’s because of the character of a blogpost, where you are expected to write for a wider (albeit imagined) audience.
However, you still need to demonstrate where you get your ideas from, as is the norm and requirement in academic studies. On the SPERI blog and many others, this is done through hyperlinks. But for the purposes of this assessment, please use footnotes.
Check Blackboard for further guidance on assessments, including important information on plagiarism – these assessments will be subject to plagiarism checks like normal.EC3016 International Economics Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow EC3016 International Economics Assignment
EC3016 International Economics Assignment